tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5258260225124673854.post2718926438389974998..comments2023-10-18T07:47:31.347+00:00Comments on XD @ WP: On quality, assessments, and worse thingsTitoxdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15371052521497564077noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5258260225124673854.post-51638799878578242552007-10-15T12:31:00.000+00:002007-10-15T12:31:00.000+00:00The only thing I may add is the need for true exte...<I>The only thing I may add is the need for true external verification by vetted experts, done completely outside Wikipedia.</I><BR/><BR/>I'm pretty confident that this will come in a few years. Indeed, we already have the way to mark reviewed articles (with the quality project), some thoughts on how to review articles (with WP 1.0), and some researchers willing to review (well... just believe me here).<BR/><BR/>What lacks is a software to bind them all.<BR/><BR/>As we are less lucky here, I'm trying to develop such a piece of software. It is called Sci-Wi, and you are welcomed to contribute and/or spread its existence:<BR/><A HREF="http://sciwi.sourceforge.net/" REL="nofollow">http://sciwi.sourceforge.net/</A>nojhanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01109653210585836352noreply@blogger.com